Main Article Content

Marco Edward
Noel Julius Ntawigaya

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of QuillBot on critical thinking among university students at Teofilo Kisanji University (TEKU), Tanzania. The study employed a qualitative research approach within the interpretivist paradigm. Data were collected through semi-structured open-ended interviews and documentary analysis. Content analysis was used to analyze the data and identify key themes. A sample of fifteen participants, including lecturers, university administrators, and students, was selected for the study. The findings indicate that QuillBot has both positive and negative effects on critical thinking among university students. The negative impacts include overdependence on technology, reduced original thought, academic integrity concerns, decreased discussion and debate, potential plagiarism, while the positive impacts include enhanced language proficiency, increased research efficiency, improved self-confidence, learning, and writing skills. The study found that while QuillBot, as an artificial intelligence tool, has supported the development of critical thinking, some students have become overly reliant on it, neglecting to engage their own thinking effectively. It is recommended that the government, through media outlets, provide education on the benefits and drawbacks of using QuillBot in teaching and learning

Article Details

How to Cite
Edward, M., & Julius Ntawigaya, N. (2025). The Impact of Quillbot Tools on Critical Thinking Skills Among University Students in Tanzania. Indonesian Educational Research Journal, 3(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.56773/ierj.v3i1.83
Section
Original Research

References

Akbari, O. (2020). Students’ Self-Confidence and Its Impacts on Their Learning Process. American International Journal of Social Science Research, 5(1),1-15. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2032-7142.

Asmara, Y. V. (2024). Students’ Lived Experience in Utilizing Quillbot as an Online Paraphrasing Tool in Academic Writing. Globish (An English-Indonesian. Journal for English, Education and Culture,13(1), 56-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/globish.v13i1.10088.

Davarpanah, N., Izadpanah, S. & Fasih, P. (2021). The Relationship between Critical Thinking Frequency, Informal Fallacy and Evidence in Argumentative Writing Jordan. Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures,13(2), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.13.2.7.

El-Garawany, M. S. M. (2024). The effects of a QuillBot-based intervention on English Language Majors’ EFL Writing Performance, Apprehension, and Self-efficacy. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 43(1), 167-189. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1457355.

Fithriani, R., & Kurniati, E.Y. (2022). Post-Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Quillbot Utilization in English Academic Writing Class. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning,7(3),437-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i3.852.

Fitria, T. N. (2021). Quillbot as an Online Tool: Students’ altenative in Paraphraising and Rewriting of English Writing. Journal of Language Education and Humanities, 9(1) ,183-196. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v9i1.10233.

Geçirilmesi, G., & Ozturk, N. (2024). Revisiting Flavell’s Metacognition Theory for Metacognitive Responsiveness. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 17(2), 257-271. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1232284.

Khairuddin, Z., Ismayatim, W. F., Ismail, O., Hanim, N. & Zamri, N. A. (2021). Exploring Critical Thinking in Writin. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 626, 67-72. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211227.012.

Khatami, M., Lai, W., He, W. & Haji-othman, N. A. (2023). Examining the Relationship between Teachers’ Creativity and Students’ Critical Thinking in the Context of EFL Learning in Iran. Environment and Social Psychology, 8(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v8i3.2004.

Krullaars, Z. H., Januardani, A., Zhou, L., & Jonkers, E. (2023). Exploring initial interactions: High school students and generative ai chatbots for relationship Development. International Electronic Journal, 8(1), 23-69. https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2023-mci-src-415.

Kurniati, E. Y. & Fithriani, R. (2022). Post-Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Quillbot Utilization in English Academic Writing Class. Journal of English Language Teaching and Lingustics, 7(3), 437-451. https://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i3.852.

Mohammad, T., Alzubi, A.A.F., Nazim, M. & Khan, S. I. (2024). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Quillbot in Improving Students’ Paraphrasing Skills: Teachers’ Voices. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology,102(6), 2556-2567.

Moradiyousefabadi, M. & Ghafournia, N. (2023). The Impact of Self-Confindence on English Language Proficiency Neyshabur. Health Educational sciences Psychology.

Muhamad, et.al. (2024). Useful AI Tools for English Teachers. Kedungbanteng: Rizquna. http://e-repository.perpus.uinsalatiga.ac.id/id/eprint/21414.

Nguyen, Q. H. (2023). AI and Plagiarism: Opinion from Teachers, Administrators and Policymakers. Proceedings of the Asia CALL International Conference, 4, 75-85. https://doi.org/10.54855/paic.2346.

Nor, H. M., & Sihes, A. J. (2021). Critical Thinking Skills in Education: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(11),198-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i11/11529.

Nurmayanti, N. & Suryadi, S. (2023). The Effectiveness of Using Quillbot in Improving Writing for Students of English Education Study Program. Jurnal Penelitian and Pengembangan Pembelajan, 8(1), 32-40.

Raheem, B.R., Anjum, F. & Ghafar, N. (2023). Exploring the Profound Impact of Artificial Intelligence Applications (Quillbot, Grammarly and ChatGPT) on English Academic Writings: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Intergrative Research (IJIR), 1(10), 599-622. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijir.v1i10.366.

Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L.D. (2024). The Effects of Over-Reliance on AI Dialogue Systems on Students’ Cognitive Abilities: A Systematic Review. Smart Learning Environment,11(28), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7.